Explore the possibility of moving the Government to the Web 2 in IRAN

Alireza Shirvani, Ameneh Malmir, Fariba Azizzadeh

Abstract


In the age of digital information, it seems the government has increased expectations of citizens. The Government expects the flow of information between citizens and government agencies to support multilateral. In line with the need to recognize the need to engage with citizens and citizen-oriented content, state agencies to use Web 2 tools have on your website. Due to the lack of adequate scientific research in the field of web applications in public section, this paper focuses on the use of Web tools in public 2 that have concentrated in Hamadan. This type of survey is run on the target application. All employees of the governmental statistical population of 44,352 people in the province in the years 2012 and selected sample of 380 the Morgan. Methods of data collection, web questionnaire with 20 questions and 2 were estimated using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of 85.2 percent. Presumptive level data analysis was done using the Z test. This article has been tested four hypotheses. The components include: creating information symmetry services, solutions and policy is made the results of testing this hypothesis is rejected and the supply is undesirable citizens.


Keywords


Citizenship Resources, State Machines, Web 2 "Social Networks (Facebook), Media or Multimedia Sharing, Wikis, Blogs, Micro Blogging (Twitter) and Chat."

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bawden, D. (2007). After the Amazoogle: Web 2.0 and information research [Editorial].Journal of Documentation, 61(4), 461−462.

Bolan, Kimberly, Meg Canada, and Rob Cullin (2007). Web, Library, and Teen Services 2.0. Young Adult Library Services Winter 2007.pp 40-44.

Burhanna, Kenneth J., Jamie Seeholzer and Joseph Salem Jr(2009) No Natives Here: A Focus Group Study of Student Perceptions of Web 2.0 and the Academic Library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(6), pp. 523–532

Bittle, S., Haller, C., & Kadlec, A. (2009). Promising Practices in Online Engagement. NewYorkØŒCenter for Advances in Public Engagement, Public Agenda. Retrieved July 1, 2011.

Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2004). Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in Open Source software. Retrieved July 1, 2011.

Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.

Breul, J. D. (2010). Practitioner's perspective—Improving sourcing decisions. Public Administration Review, 70(S1), 193–200

Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009). Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social networking sites. Paper presented at the CHI 2009, Boston.

DiMaio, A. (2009). Government 2.0: A Gartner definition. Retrieved July 1, 2011, from.

Dutton, W. H. (2011). Networking distributed public expertise: Strategies for citizen sourcing advice to government. Retrieved July 1, 2011 from.

Howe, J. (2009). Crowdsourcing:Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business .New York: Random House.

Johannessen, M. R. (2010). Different theory, different result: Examining how different theories lead to different insights in government 2.0 research. Proceedings of the 1st Scandinavian Conference of Information Systems and the 33rd Information Systems Research in Scandinavia (IRIS) Seminar, Skørping, Denmark August,pp 20–24.

Lukensmeyer, C. J., & Torres, L. H. (2008). Citizensourcing: Citizen participation in a networked nation. In K. Yang, & E. Bergrud (Eds.), Civic engagement in a network society (pp 207–233).

Obama, B. (2009). Memorandumfor the heads of executive departments and agencies: Transparency and open government. January 21. Retrieved July 1, 2011.

Rafaeli, S., & Ariel, Y. (2008). Online motivational factors: Incentives for participation and contribution in Wikipedia. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 243–267).

Ramos, M., & Piper, P. S. (2006). Letting the grass grow: Grassroots information on blogs and wikis. Reference Services Review, 34(4), 570–574

Shkabatur, J. (2011). Cities @ crossroads: Digital technology and local democracy in America. Brooklyn Law Review, 76(4) Retrieved July 1, 2011.

Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2008). Wiki nomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Penguin Group Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow. New York.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 1694-2507 (Print)

ISSN: 1694-2108 (Online)