Determining weight of known evaluation criteria in the field of Mehr housing using ANP approach

saeed safari, Mohammad Shojaee, Mohammad Tavakolian, Majid Assarian

Abstract


Nowadays, providing house is one of the most important needs of people. Based on Maslow theory, people can’t step toward flourishing their other aptitudes till resolving this need. According to considerable increase in house price especially in recent years, organizations and departments are trying to resolve this need at least in their employees. Based on this fact, in many of organizations, units or better to say companies called cooperation housing companies are established which tr y to resolve this need in their staffs. These companies don’t follow their profits and often have small number of employees.

On the other hand, organizations are analyzing and evaluating their performance continuously. This evaluation can be annual or can be as percentage in comparison with last year performance. But this kind of evaluation is not correct because of relatively high economic turbulence   in recent years and so regression and improving of organizations or companies are not done correctly. And also this evaluation has to be in comparison with opponents to be more reliable. In this paper, based on this fact, at first experts opinion and performed researches in this field have been identified and then with establishment of communication network among these criteria, using ANP model, we   have evaluated and weighted these criteria and ultimately, suggestions have been proposed in order to improve efficiency of evaluation criteria and also Mehr housing cooperation.


Keywords


Mehr Housing Cooperative, Evaluation Criteria, Matrix of Paired Comparisons, ANP Model.

Full Text:

PDF

References


^ a b Saaty, Thomas L. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications. ISBN 1-888603-06-2.

^ Saaty, Thomas L.; Luis G. Vargas (2006). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-33859-4.

^ Saaty, Thomas L.; Brady Cillo (2009). The Encyclicon, Volume 2: A Dictionary of Complex Decisions using the Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications. ISBN 1-888603-09-7.

^ In 2005, one book cited examples from the United States, Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Korea, Poland, Russia, Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey.

^ Saaty, Thomas L.; Müjgan S. Özermir (2005). The Encyclicon: A Dictionary of Decisions with Dependence and Feedback Based on the Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications. ISBN 1-888603-05-4.

Harker, P.T. and Vargas, L.G. (1990), “Reply to remarks on the analytic hierarchy processâ€,Management Science, No. 36, pp. 269-73.

Saaty, T.L. (1999), “Fundamentals of the analytical network processâ€, Proceedings of ISAHP 1999, Kobe, Japan, 12-14 August, pp. 48-63.

^ Saaty, Thomas L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications. ISBN 0-9620317-9-8.

Saaty, T.L. (2001a), Decision Making in Complex Environments: The Analytic Network Process for Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 1694-2507 (Print)

ISSN: 1694-2108 (Online)